rich1.0paxchristi (npub13p…cmj3f)https://nostr.ae/npub13paz6seqlckvtvwfxwhjz60ycupkh5zj6ykz7d67zqkxyjnl6j8sqcmj3fnjumphttps://nostr.ae“Burden of proof” already assumes reason, logic, truth, and intelligibility. I’m asking what grounds those things. I’m not asking you to believe my word; I’m asking whether your worldview can account for the very conditions that make proof possible. So when you ask for proof, what kind of proof do you mean? And what, in your view, sufficiently grounds reason’s reliability and reality’s intelligibility if not God? If you think this is wrong, address the actual question: what grounds reason, truth, and intelligibility on your view?