rich1.0npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgydhttps://nostr.ae/npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgydnjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2014-03-06 📝 Original message:> > if some sort of Stealth address or HD wallet root was the identity gaining > the reputation, then address re-use wouldn't have to be mandatory. > The identity would be the X.520 name in the signing cert that signed the payment request. It doesn't have to be a difficult to obtain cert. It could even be self signed for this use case, but then you lose the security benefits and a key rotation would delete your reputation, so in practice I think most people would want the reputation to accrue to the name itself. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140306/862d156e/attachment.html>