rich1.0npub1cpxwma0gzj4psea07fk0ukc923mcut40t6kn4s2kp5xdkm3gqlxq37msgphttps://nostr.ae/npub1cpxwma0gzj4psea07fk0ukc923mcut40t6kn4s2kp5xdkm3gqlxq37msgpnjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2012-07-23 📝 Original message:Hello, Even though I'm not a dev, I can't agree more, and would like to know if they are expected steps being taken, some fixes coming, or whatever? Thank you all for your hard work. Raphael On 07/23/2012 12:37 AM, grarpamp wrote: > Given a testbed: Pentium 4 1.8GHz single core, 2GB ram, FreeBSD 8, > disk is geli aes-128 + zfs sha-256, bitcoin 0.6.3, Tor proxy, > An estimate is made that by the end of the year bitcoin will > completely overrun the capabilities of this reasonable class of > machines. > It already takes a month to build a new blockchain, let alone keep up > with new incoming blocks. > Yes, it also has workstation duties, yet even if those were removed, > it would probably choke by mid 2013. > > It would appear bitcoin has some *serious* scalability hurdles coming > down the road. > Most certainly if the user expects to independantly build, manage, and > trust their own blockchain. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development