<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2012-05-02&#xA;📝 Original message:On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:58 PM, grarpamp &lt;grarpamp at gmail.com&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt;&gt; Try &#34;Reply to All&#34;&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; That puts the sender in &#39;to&#39; and list in &#39;cc&#39;,&#xA;&gt; which dupes to the sender and eventually&#xA;&gt; blows out the to and cc lines as everyone&#xA;&gt; chimes in and doesn&#39;t trim. &#39;reply to&#39; solves&#xA;&gt; most of that. assuming the list sw can do it.&#xA;&#xA;&#34;Reply-To&#34; Munging Considered Harmful&#xA;http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;-- &#xA;Jeff Garzik&#xA;exMULTI, Inc.&#xA;jgarzik at exmulti.com</html></oembed>