<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>Sofia (npub14r…rssgp)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub14rcsfr6ly5e6avame4z644c3r38zwv6pgz5glspt7k809lrgzycqqrssgp</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>there is a very important difference between not being *willing* to discuss something, and *not discussing* it&#xA;&#xA;you demonstrate being actively unwilling to discuss something the moment someone probes you about it and you refuse to engage, and that is wrong simply because it&#39;s fundamentally *dogmatic*, it doesn&#39;t allow the other party to thoroughly challenge you&#xA;&#xA;if you never discuss something because no one else ever brings it up either, that&#39;s perfectly fine, you don&#39;t have to be an evangelist for everything you believe (and you probably shouldn&#39;t)</html></oembed>