rich1.0npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2https://nostr.ae/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2njumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23 📝 Original message:On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 06:04:49PM +0000, Justus Ranvier wrote: > The integrity of Bitcoin is more important than you and your personal > preferences. > > > You don't have the right to decide which valid scripts in the > blockchain will be disregarded, and neither does anyone else. > > > If you don't like what's in the blockchain, you and everybody else can > work within the protocol to orphan the offending block. > > > But if you fail, then what's written in the blockchain is final and > the sole purpose of the network is to enforce it - deal with it. Agreed, although I think waxwing put it better: Bitcoin's most fundamental property is its neutrality. If it loses this, it is not Bitcoin. But I also agree with Gavin that the bitcoin-development email list is a perfectly good place to have these types of discussions. I myself have used it repeatedly to publish ideas specifically due to wide readership and multiple independent archives. > PS: We don't even know who runs BitUndo. They seem to have lots of > money to spend on web design - I wonder where it came from? Actually we do: Eric Springer See http://www.coindesk.com/double-spending-unconfirmed-transactions-concern-bitcoin/ https://github.com/espringe - joined Feb 11 2010 Anyway that's just twitter bootstrap or something; I hear the wizards can pump out a site like that in a few hours. -- 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 000000000000000004af1fb3b77c0f7ffe640982e440ac3eb085fa51d8207838 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 685 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140423/f0ab2011/attachment.sig>