<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1dacz4nwrx7egdpnjkkcpfz5jeecshvgpsvpsy6rw7x0k75vf9v8s37g9vc</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1dacz4nwrx7egdpnjkkcpfz5jeecshvgpsvpsy6rw7x0k75vf9v8s37g9vc</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2013-12-08&#xA;📝 Original message:Have you considered black lotus dedicated servers?&#xA;&#xA;On 12/08/2013 03:16 PM, Saïvann Carignan wrote:&#xA;&gt;&gt; Issues that would need to be resolved:&#xA;&gt;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&gt; 1) Who pays for it? Most obvious answer: Foundation. However there&#39;s&#xA;&gt;&gt; currently a fairly clear line between the foundation website and the&#xA;&gt;&gt; bitcoin.org &lt;http://bitcoin.org&gt; website. I personally am fine with the&#xA;&gt;&gt; bitcoin foundation funding the website, it&#39;s a lot closer to the bitcoin&#xA;&gt;&gt; community than github. But some people might care. So next step would be&#xA;&gt;&gt; to contact the Foundation board and see if they&#39;re willing to fund it.&#xA;&gt; Actually I might find way to fund it. But I needed to have ACK &amp;&#xA;&gt; comments from developers before anything.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&gt; 2) Anti-DoS? I assume github handles this at the moment, though I doubt&#xA;&gt;&gt; there&#39;s anything to be gained from DoSing the informational website&#xA;&gt; That is a fair question, we will need anti-DDoS. Unless something better&#xA;&gt; (and affordable) can be recommended, this would yet put another Bitcoin&#xA;&gt; website under CloudFlare.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&gt; 4) Who admins it?&#xA;&gt; Obviously, I thought it would be important that the server is owned by&#xA;&gt; someone who can be trusted, with ssh access for all core developers.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&gt; 5) Who controls DNS for it?&#xA;&gt; I&#39;m not sure we&#39;ll get any change on this level. I have no idea if the&#xA;&gt; domain is in good hands, except for the fact that nothing bad happened&#xA;&gt; thus far. If anything, moving it to core developers (as intended when&#xA;&gt; the domain was registered) would make more sense IMO. But again, is it&#xA;&gt; possible, I don&#39;t know.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; ------------------------------------------------------------------------------&#xA;&gt; Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK &#xA;&gt; Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.&#xA;&gt; Download it for free now!&#xA;&gt; http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&amp;iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk&#xA;&gt; _______________________________________________&#xA;&gt; Bitcoin-development mailing list&#xA;&gt; Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net&#xA;&gt; https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development</html></oembed>