<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub147edljttlezv8m5dugzg4ka8cg3073j3t2hq4h8ncxaz9sm5swuq4tnsv4</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub147edljttlezv8m5dugzg4ka8cg3073j3t2hq4h8ncxaz9sm5swuq4tnsv4</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-02-24&#xA;📝 Original message:On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 01:14:43AM -0500, Andy Schroder wrote:&#xA;&gt; I&#39;ve had similar issues where the NFC device has to be disconnected&#xA;&gt; and reconnected. I&#39;ve got lots of error checking in my code on the&#xA;&gt; NFC device, which helps, but still has problems sometimes. I&#39;ve&#xA;&gt; found if I limit how quickly a new connection can be made, that&#xA;&gt; reduces the problem. Have you tried this?&#xA;&#xA;I have a limit there, yes, but maybe I need to raise it. I&#39;d rather&#xA;would like it to simply not jam up instead though. :-)&#xA;&#xA;&gt; What command line tool are you using with libnfc?&#xA;&#xA;I don&#39;t remember exactly right now, but the Debian packages &#39;libnfc-bin&#39;&#xA;and &#39;libnfc-examples&#39; have some binaries and I think I used one of them&#xA;to present an NFC URI record and I ran into similar problems with&#xA;instability.&#xA;&#xA;&gt; This sounds weird to me. Why are you even using bitpay at all if you&#xA;&gt; are already going through the effort to remove a signature and&#xA;&gt; change the memo field?&#xA;&#xA;For their tie-in with the traditional banking system, i.e. cash-out in&#xA;fiat. Here in Germany that might currently be the only feasible way of&#xA;accepting bitcoins commercially, because of unresolved questions around&#xA;VAT - but that&#39;s another topic.&#xA;&#xA;Jan</html></oembed>