<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1wccnjljxnarlx564vuc37hmuzuffurljevjnmuq4u0vjmh7e933sn3hnuq</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1wccnjljxnarlx564vuc37hmuzuffurljevjnmuq4u0vjmh7e933sn3hnuq</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2014-03-27&#xA;📝 Original message:On 03/27/2014 08:09 AM, Tamas Blummer wrote:&#xA;&gt; A notable suggestion was to instead of building a directory of magic numbers (like 0 for Bitcoin, 1 for Litecoin etc) use a hash of the word &#34;Bitcoin&#34;, &#34;Litecoin&#34;, &#34;Dogecoin&#34;, so collosion is unlikely and&#xA;&gt; cetral directory is not needed.&#xA;&#xA;Nice idea, but keep in mind that you are hashing into 2^32 space, so&#xA;collisions will occur, unfortunately and we&#39;ll end up with directory&#xA;again :-/&#xA;&#xA;Even if they did not occur you would need to keep up the registry of&#xA;names anyway (is it Peercoin or PPCoin, Testnet or TestNet ...)?&#xA;&#xA;-- &#xA;Best Regards / S pozdravom,&#xA;&#xA;Pavol Rusnak &lt;stick at gk2.sk&gt;</html></oembed>