rich1.0npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8https://nostr.ae/npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8njumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2015-08-10 📝 Original message:On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Btc Drak <btcdrak at gmail.com> wrote: > Additionally, correct me if I am wrong, but the net effect from preventing > fees rising from zero would be to guarantee miners have no alternative > income from fees as block subsidy dries up and thus harm the incentives to > secure the chain. I don't think that's necessarily true. Theoretically urgent transactions could fund hashing power on their own while there are still some free non-urgent transactions being mined from time to time.