<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub16ycdmhx5sct3h37cwvjff8le7qlp9k0ngst5ry5n262j6gkesrssskjvwy</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub16ycdmhx5sct3h37cwvjff8le7qlp9k0ngst5ry5n262j6gkesrssskjvwy</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2018-05-08&#xA;📝 Original message:&#xA;If I&#39;m not mistaken, the scriptless scripts concept (as currently&#xA;formulated) falls to Schor&#39;s algorithm, and at present there is no&#xA;alternative implementation of the concept to fall back on. Correct? Lest we&#xA;build a house of cards, I&#39;d strongly urge everyone to not depend on&#xA;functional concepts whose underlying cryptographic primitives cannot be&#xA;swapped in an emergency.&#xA;&#xA;Sure, we use ecdsa for example (which is also vulnerable to Schor&#39;s&#xA;algorithm), but in contrast to scriptless scripts we have a variety of&#xA;backup primitives at our disposal that fulfill the same functional&#xA;objective.&#xA;&#xA;If scriptless scripts are found possible under lattice-based cryptography&#xA;for example, that would be something I suppose. The functional concept of&#xA;scriptless scripts is indeed very awesome - we just need to add some&#xA;cryptographic conservatism before we build on it.&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20180508/e565d776/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>