rich1.0npub1j66aek8wm7jq8vaffs2l8w43evyywd4q7tcnqyge6xqezz0vcpks7jm42mhttps://nostr.ae/npub1j66aek8wm7jq8vaffs2l8w43evyywd4q7tcnqyge6xqezz0vcpks7jm42mnjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2014-01-17 📝 Original message:On 01/16/2014 01:28 PM, Peter Todd wrote: > I'm very against the name "reusable addresses" and strongly belive we > should stick with the name stealth addresses. I agree wholeheartedly against using "reusable address". I personally am fine with "stealth address", but can see where there might be a negative connotation. Might I suggest "master address", which is neutral in connotation, but indicates both that it is fixed and that payment addresses are generated as needed from it. But please, no "reusable address." -- Johnathan Corgan, Corgan Labs SDR Training and Development Services http://corganlabs.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: johnathan.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 334 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140116/14d333f0/attachment.vcf> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 230 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140116/14d333f0/attachment.sig>