rich1.0npub1lhe3qfx2q5m7mq5d39waepf9lzhsy0cdey66svn63fyk6rt6n7ps7zg7edhttps://nostr.ae/npub1lhe3qfx2q5m7mq5d39waepf9lzhsy0cdey66svn63fyk6rt6n7ps7zg7ednjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2015-10-05 📝 Original message:On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Peter R via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > I also agree with Mike that Core's requirement for unanimous consensus > results in development grid lock and should be revisited. > There is no development gridlock. Look at the IRC logs for core-dev; look at the pull requests; look a the merge history: Development is vibrant. Developers are very active. You are manufacturing a crisis convenient to your narrative, but it is far from the actual reality on the ground. Please desist from this intellectual dishonesty and toxicity. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151005/4d591b1b/attachment.html>