rich1.0orthodoxbtc (npub1ml…4t8aw)https://nostr.ae/npub1mlcgczfj4kw50rjl87l3t4kp8wx9hl29zau7f0sd0gqwnqqsreps94t8awnjumphttps://nostr.aeI will add this: The non-BIP-110 chain is dead to me. BIP-110 will win because after activation height regardless of outcome: I will: 1) mine it at a loss, until I expire. 2) never accept a single sat of spamcoin unless it can be traded for a greater amount real bitcoin (BIP-110). We should not accept a weaker chain because ultimately, it will fail. Your assertion that you would "immediately URSF" seems speculative, assuming there is some resistance against the newer restrictive rules that a hard fork implementation exists.l? Unless you are planning to implement it yourself? You are correct, and other than that minor point, I completely agree with you. The digital control grid is on the way, bitcoin must succeed and not become an instrument of the state by being controlled by captured interests (corporate BTC). Saylor and Blackrock are opposed because they are controlled.