<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>AndersL (npub1p3…ad6pe)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1p37gz205d5avyut6dzz3dlrw5q32tlj3qtasmmq3gf9rpj2fm5fs2ad6pe</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>I&#39;d say the overwhelming amount of evidence made me take this position, and a good dose of common sense, after going through the material and critic. When you see how the critic is communicated and dealt with, the common sense kick in. &#xA;&#xA;There is no theory that deals with, the melting of the amount of ice, Clovis culture disappearing and the mega fauna disappearing. &#xA;&#xA;Water, and traces of water is pretty honest. Same with stones. </html></oembed>