<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kw</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kw</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2013-10-25&#xA;📝 Original message:Mike Hearn has been lobbying for an &#34;error&#34; message in the Bitcoin p2p&#xA;protocol for years (at least since the &#34;ban peers if they send us garbage&#34;&#xA;denial-of-service mitigation code was pull-requested). This came up again&#xA;with my proposed &#34;smartfee&#34; changes, which would drop low-priority or&#xA;low-fee transactions.&#xA;&#xA;In short, giving peers feedback about why their blocks or transactions are&#xA;dropped or why they are being banned should help interoperability between&#xA;different implementations, and will give SPV (simplified payment&#xA;verification) clients feedback when their transactions are rejected due to&#xA;insufficient priority or fees.&#xA;&#xA;See the gist for details, I&#39;m looking for feedback and planning on&#xA;implementing this before circling back to finish the &#39;smart fee&#39; work:&#xA;&#xA;   https://gist.github.com/gavinandresen/7079034&#xA;&#xA;-- &#xA;--&#xA;Gavin Andresen&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131026/86e9867d/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>