rich1.0npub1rv5ajnhgrc0wq3ulrk6tcjkgsaq8h4rs5rtsvrnklz4j0lw40egqphc5wthttps://nostr.ae/npub1rv5ajnhgrc0wq3ulrk6tcjkgsaq8h4rs5rtsvrnklz4j0lw40egqphc5wtnjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2015-08-15 📝 Original message:> So if you want a user vote, that's an issue that'd have to be tackled: > the people who admin the main communication channels Bitcoin users have > vowed to censor any program that doesn't slavishly follow 51%+ hash > power. That attempt to control the conversation is certainly not > libertarian or democratic in nature, but there you go. These types of actions are immediately apparent to anyone who looks at the Bitcoin ecosystem (Bitcoin.org, Githib, Wiki, bitcointalk, etc.) and were readily apparent long before any block size debate. It is almost a taboo subject and anyone who raises these types of issues is immediately labeled as a "troll." These are the people who used to run around saying that Bitcoin development is "decentralized" because anyone can fork the code and now many of the same people claim a fork will destroy everything. The problem is that a small group of highly irrational and inexperienced people (outside of the small and unusual Bitcoin ecosystem) have control over the majority of the resources. I think over time the problem will even itself out but currently it is an obstacle in moving Bitcoin forward. Russ