<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kw</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kw</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2013-12-08&#xA;📝 Original message:&gt;&#xA;&gt; &gt; 4) Who admins it?&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; Obviously, I thought it would be important that the server is owned by&#xA;&gt; someone who can be trusted, with ssh access for all core developers.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&#xA;That is a really bad idea.  If there is not a CLEAR answer to &#34;who admins&#xA;it&#34;, there will be a bunch of &#34;I thought YOU were applying security&#xA;patches... no, I thought YOU were...&#34; the first time it gets hacked.&#xA;&#xA;So, the question is:  who wants to take responsibility for keeping&#xA;bitcoin.org safe and secure?&#xA;&#xA;I am not going to do that, I&#39;ve got too many other things to worry about.&#xA;It is exactly the type of thing the Foundation was setup to do, but if&#xA;y&#39;all want to create some other organization to do it, then please make it&#xA;happen.&#xA;&#xA;-- &#xA;--&#xA;Gavin Andresen&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131209/2960d236/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>