<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1mju50kqcm07heu967fkq6h4kq666xgekc4yrldf7q52xx9vr8jnsrdxnq7</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1mju50kqcm07heu967fkq6h4kq666xgekc4yrldf7q52xx9vr8jnsrdxnq7</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-10-05&#xA;📝 Original message:On Monday 5. October 2015 20.33.04 s7r via bitcoin-dev wrote:&#xA;&gt; For example, I don&#39;t see this controversial nor a violation of the BIP&#xA;&gt; requirements. Mike had some fair objections, they were explained by&#xA;&gt; gmaxwell and Jorge, everybody understood. The explanation is clear,&#xA;&gt; with plausible practical examples, so from my point of view the&#xA;&gt; objections have no arguments to sustain the claim.&#xA;&#xA;I enjoyed reading them, but I have to admit I&#39;m not convinced and for me the &#xA;objections stand.&#xA;&#xA;Softforks are unnecessarily dangerous and I feel entirely avoidable. It is a &#xA;risk that not worth taking.</html></oembed>