rich1.0npub12tjaqer27049ejmvf0f3yd7kq6p93gg6ecavgrczge4rlzf59y5q2pye9hhttps://nostr.ae/npub12tjaqer27049ejmvf0f3yd7kq6p93gg6ecavgrczge4rlzf59y5q2pye9hnjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2016-06-24 📝 Original message:> Clearly the primary purpose of BIP0075 is to enshrine a DNSSEC protocol > for giving wallet addresses memorable names. > > I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not, but if you aren't, I don't think this is an accurate description at all. BIP75 is, at its most simplest, nothing more than an encrypted/encapsulated version of BIP70. All we did was make it safe for people to exchange BIP70 messages through an intermediary. The only identity information included in BIP75 is the pki_data field, which wasn't even introduced in BIP75--it was already in BIP70. I'm guessing Peter would also have us remove BIP70 altogether? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160624/4fda853a/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PastedGraphic-1.tiff Type: image/tiff Size: 10972 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160624/4fda853a/attachment.tiff>