<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1g6vxlp4e0nyhs2dqxxcryztyf5f5hyuaq93nw4r87zcnv0sdsa0qqsl5wd</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1g6vxlp4e0nyhs2dqxxcryztyf5f5hyuaq93nw4r87zcnv0sdsa0qqsl5wd</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2017-09-06&#xA;📝 Original message:On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 10:51 PM, Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev &lt;&#xA;bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org&gt; wrote:&#xA;&#xA;&gt; Is there any reason or use case to keep allowing spendable outputs&#xA;&gt; with null amounts in them?&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Someone could have created a timelocked transaction that depends on a zero&#xA;value output.&#xA;&#xA;This could be protected by requiring a tx version number change.  Only zero&#xA;outputs in the new version would be affected.&#xA;&#xA;I am not sure how strictly people are sticking to that rule though.&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170906/ea09555c/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>