<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>codonaft (npub1al…7rg94)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1alptdev5srcw2hxg03567p4k6xs3lgj7f6545suc0rzp0xw98svse7rg94</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>&gt; Clearly you are doing this. When you request a feature in GrapheneOS, then you request the Graphene team to work on this solution.&#xA;&#xA;Nope, this is out of context.&#xA;&#xA;I *used to* request this in the past (before publishing this meme) here on Nostr, but as soon as I noticed they ignored my messages, I did research and found their &#34;criticism&#34; of the similar request:&#xA;&#xA;&gt; What you&#39;re requesting is that we add things which are easily detected by unsophisticated adversaries&#xA;&#xA;Which is a strawman argument. The duress pin behavior is currently clear without any tools: a device reboots, shows an error.&#xA;&#xA;And in the same response they have:&#xA;&#xA;&gt; Keep doing it and you&#39;ll be suspended&#xA;&#xA;Because somebody suspected that they are targeting some unexpected scope they can&#39;t properly explain.&#xA;&#xA;Two very bold mistakes in one comment. This would be insanity to ask them for any request after reading all this.&#xA;&#xA;And what scope is that really? I don&#39;t know for sure yet. I received an independent response here, a good one:&#xA;&#xA;nostr:nevent1qqsxfetl54z0lr43s5p6lxk6hygyjgkp8sun8tn2mv83dencr6dl87gprpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezucm0v3hkuctxwshxxmmdqy28wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwd4skjmpwd35sygpjvd68tmqz2maaw4zhrt422tz52nym670m0tzmn86nhpk0ew2j0g730lnp&#xA;&#xA;&gt; protecting whoever else&#xA;&#xA;Is the phone owner&#39;s security part of the scope? Hello, nostr:npub1235tem4hfn34edqh8hxfja9amty73998f0eagnuu4zm423s9e8ksdg0ht5? I know you won&#39;t respond to me. All this is for the records.&#xA;&#xA;Users have no idea what Pandora&#39;s box they are carrying with them.</html></oembed>