rich1.0npub105eg2ny7gs448umtlsn4ns4slc5q3se8wpnzhtr22j8sgdrv2q7stlgz5ahttps://nostr.ae/npub105eg2ny7gs448umtlsn4ns4slc5q3se8wpnzhtr22j8sgdrv2q7stlgz5anjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2015-08-20 📝 Original message:Add: For - If everyone agrees an increase is required at some point, The longer you leave it the greater the numbers who have to upgrade Against - Insufficient testing before moving to production ready releases sets a bad precedent On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Elliot Olds via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Jorge Timón < > bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > >> To be clear, these two are just my personal lists of arguments on >> "each side" to clear my mind and try to be perfectly objective. >> [...] >> Here's the updated both-thread lists: >> >> >> http://0bin.net/paste/igHZMgeoIbYjCJd9#ovaOUlSAKvQYT2p3VXuIuUmNk2XyLH-GnjR5NZMZgFb > > > I thought this was a good idea, so I turned my personal notes into a site > attempting to list all the strongest arguments and counterarguments on the > block size debate. I made mine a bit more detailed. > > Here's the site: https://sites.google.com/site/bitcoinblocksizedebate/ > > Feedback welcome. > > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150820/31894e56/attachment.html>