<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1uu2fve28mkg68uequseraz8gee7qg64733lr9r2g4c0xs5pmqnuslr4rpf</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1uu2fve28mkg68uequseraz8gee7qg64733lr9r2g4c0xs5pmqnuslr4rpf</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-08-12&#xA;📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----&#xA;Hash: SHA1&#xA;&#xA;Jorge, you say 3 concerns at the end of your message but I only see 1)&#xA;and 2). Assuming you&#39;ve got a 3) and will add it, I&#39;ll contribute:&#xA;&#xA;4) General, undefined fear that something bad is going to happen when&#xA;nodes choke up on a backlog of transactions.&#xA;- - no specific symptoms are pointed at but presumably there is&#xA;&#34;pre-traumatic stress&#34; at play.&#xA;- - Bitcoin-based businesses are going to lose money, customers and&#xA;potentially fail&#xA;- - people will flee Bitcoin for another cryptocoin and Bitcoin will be&#xA;left in the corner, collecting dust and memories of it will fade as&#xA;SuperCoin with its big blocks becomes all things to all people.&#xA;&#xA;5) Specific belief that the exchange rate will decline on network&#xA;unreliability&#xA;- - traders and investors will bid the price down, or&#xA;- - traders/investors will stop speculating all together because even if&#xA;their speculation is successful, they&#39;re not sure they&#39;ll be able to&#xA;get their bitcoin out of exchanges, what with the broken network and all.&#xA;- - The exchange rate reflects Bitcoin&#39;s value and not just speculation&#xA;guided by a few large players like in other markets.&#xA;&#xA;6) Belief that Bitcoin&#39;s &#34;cargo&#34; is about to be delivered by fate:&#xA;- - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_cult&#xA;- - the cargo is variably presumed to be a range of hoped-for events: an&#xA;adoption surge, a speculative rally similar to (or bigger than) 2013,&#xA;or a global financial crisis that sees Bitcoin become the safe haven&#xA;of choice.&#xA;- - for the cargo to be delivered, a &#34;runway&#34; must be built - the larger&#xA;the runway, the larger the cargo delivery. If the current runway is&#xA;not expanded, then the cargo plane will go to a different island and&#xA;won&#39;t come to Bitcoin Island.&#xA;- - it is short-sighted and, in a way, ungrateful of the &#34;generals&#34; not&#xA;to expand the runway - it will be their fault that the cargo doesn&#39;t&#xA;get delivered and all the island&#39;s people, no the whole ocean&#39;s&#xA;islands, will suffer because of silly security concerns.&#xA;- - some people have taken the blueprints of the airbase and are&#xA;building a large airstrip elsewhere on Bitcoin Island, but nobody is&#xA;helping them build that long and wide runway. Everybody wants to&#xA;expand this moderate runway - even the renegades who started Big&#xA;Blocks Great Success airstrip.&#xA;- - The sacred site of No-Middle-Zero-Attack-Point is at the start of&#xA;the current runway. To expand it the site must be destroyed, but some&#xA;former generals and many people say: It doesn&#39;t matter, we want Cargo,&#xA;not a small attack surface. Just blast it!&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;On 08/12/2015 04:59 PM, Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev wrote:&#xA;&gt; I believe all concerns I&#39;ve read can be classified in the following&#xA;&gt; groups:&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt;&gt; 1) Potential indirect consequence of rising fees.&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; - Lowest fee transactions (currently free transactions) will&#xA;&gt; become more unreliable. - People will migrate to competing systems&#xA;&gt; (PoW altcoins) with lower fees.&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt;&gt; 2) Software problem independent of a concrete block size that&#xA;&gt;&gt; needs to be solved anyway, often specific to Bitcoin Core (ie&#xA;&gt;&gt; other implementations, say libbitcoin may not necessarily share&#xA;&gt;&gt; these problems).&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; - Bitcoin Core&#39;s mempool is unbounded in size and can make the&#xA;&gt; program crash by using too much memory. - There&#39;s no good way to&#xA;&gt; increase the fee of a transaction that is taking too long to be&#xA;&gt; mined without the &#34;double spending&#34; transaction with the higher fee&#xA;&gt; being blocked by most nodes which follow Bitcoin Core&#39;s default&#xA;&gt; policy for conflicting spends replacements (aka &#34;first seen&#34;&#xA;&gt; replacement policy).&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; I have started with the 3 concerns that I read more often, but&#xA;&gt; please suggest more concerns for these categories and suggest&#xA;&gt; other categories if you think there&#39;s more. &#xA;&gt; _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing&#xA;&gt; list bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org &#xA;&gt; https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev&#xA;&gt; &#xA;-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----&#xA;Version: GnuPG v1&#xA;&#xA;iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVyyxLAAoJEGwAhlQc8H1mEmMH/j6ZAcsHIYT7+8EtOP6T8LTB&#xA;0M4njFlkMsT6owruY9sucIP5c+DjNXoTHqFdgdNnWluW2JNQ0L6wnbWSR9NSbo2h&#xA;WlwpMKV0o8XdEQIZV3ZH4kltlIH0napvddsjmvMZDiZU2R/2Lp6KVxK0NEPB4IOC&#xA;jZ4UM0v/XuYiu1I+zpnvi9MS3X/MTYzf7a5JZ9D6CiCksc+X18GtFLogKJG5uVRn&#xA;at58cdHQX/TgIhO/RcYV9PStztT93I6uh92RrQyRmXVMn9u2/bZZXTgk9CL9YkO0&#xA;g0Imw7vt0ieZ2E9m0QUlJ8tJQKEESflNI0ccachGPKpOKGTsshqbZ370uDKcDWA=&#xA;=v3a1&#xA;-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----</html></oembed>