rich1.0npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8https://nostr.ae/npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8njumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2014-04-05 📝 Original message:I like both DD-MM-YYYY and YYYY-MM-DD. I just dislike MM-DD-YYYY and YYYY-DD-MM. On 4/4/14, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at bitpay.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Wladimir <laanwj at gmail.com> wrote: >> Personally I'd prefer to standardize on ISO 8601 (YYYY-MM-DD) dates as >> well. > > +1 for all-numeric, easily computer parse-able without a lookup table, > and naturally sorts correctly in a lexicographic sort. > > English (or any language) should never be in a date format, on a computer. > > -- > Jeff Garzik > Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist > BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > -- Jorge Timón http://freico.in/