<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>Gzuuus (npub1gz…ea5ds)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1gzuushllat7pet0ccv9yuhygvc8ldeyhrgxuwg744dn5khnpk3gs3ea5ds</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>Hey! How’s it going? I’m sharing some new ideas that came out of nostr:npub1s0veng2gvfwr62acrxhnqexq76sj6ldg3a5t935jy8e6w3shr5vsnwrmq5 6. They feel especially relevant given the recent news about compromised keys.&#xA;&#xA;This is a new NIP for identity checkpoints. In simple terms, a checkpoint is a signed event that says: &#34;this key is me at this moment&#34; Over time, that checkpoint can gather evidence and attestations from other people, helping to maintain identity continuity.&#xA;https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/2278&#xA;&#xA;The idea is that anyone can create a checkpoint to show they control a key. Later, if something bad happens, like losing the key or having it compromised, they can publish a new checkpoint linked to the old one. That creates a lineage people can look at to decide whether the new identity claim seems legitimate or trustworthy.&#xA;&#xA;When you combine this with OTS, social graphs, NIP-05, and other forms of evidence, you get a way to deal with identity recovery, which in decentralized networks like Nostr, is crucial since there is no central authority that can definitively say &#34;this person kept their identity&#34;. The best we can do is evaluate the available evidence. This proposal is all about that&#xA;&#xA;Alongside this, there is also a complementary Snapshots NIP, which lets users preserve a specific version of a replaceable event. That can strengthen the evidence and reduce some attack vectors.&#xA;https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/2279&#xA;I’ll soon publish an app to help create, visualize, and use all of this. Hope you find it interesting.&#xA;&#xA;#soveng #sec-6</html></oembed>