<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1zw7cc8z78v6s3grujfvcv3ckpvg6kr0w7nz9yzvwyglyg0qu5sjsqhkhpx</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1zw7cc8z78v6s3grujfvcv3ckpvg6kr0w7nz9yzvwyglyg0qu5sjsqhkhpx</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2018-10-12&#xA;📝 Original message:&#xA;ZmnSCPxj &lt;ZmnSCPxj at protonmail.com&gt; writes:&#xA;&gt; Good morning Rusty,&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; In BOLT #2 we currently impose a 2^24 satoshi limit on total channel capacity.  Is splicing intended to allow violation of this limit? I do not see it mentioned in the proposal. Can I splice 21 million bitcoins on a 1-satoshi channel?&#xA;&#xA;Good question!  I think that&#39;s the kind of thing we should consider&#xA;carefully at the Summit.&#xA;&#xA;&gt; It may be good to start brainstorming possible failure modes during splice, and how to recover, and also to indicate the expected behavior in the proposal, as I believe these will be the points where splicing must be designed most precisely. What happens when a splice is ongoing and the communication gets disconnected?  What happens when some channel failure occurs during splicing and we are forced to drop onchain?  And so on.&#xA;&#xA;Agreed, but we&#39;re now debating two fairly different methods for&#xA;splicing.  Once we&#39;ve decided on that, we can try to design the&#xA;proposals themselves.&#xA;&#xA;Thanks,&#xA;Rusty.</html></oembed>