<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2013-06-04&#xA;📝 Original message:On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Roy Badami &lt;roy at gnomon.org.uk&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt;&gt; Sure they are paying themselves, but given bitcoin network&#xA;&gt;&gt; difficulty is uso high, simply obtaining payments-go-myself-as-miner&#xA;&gt;&gt; transactions is itself difficult.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; Not for pool operators it isn&#39;t.  Nor for people buying hashing power&#xA;&gt; from a GPUMAX-type service, if such services still exist (or should&#xA;&gt; they exist again in future).&#xA;&#xA;Re-read what I wrote.  That&#39;s perfectly OK.  It is analogous to a pool&#xA;operator receiving merged mined coins, each time they mine a bitcoin&#xA;block.&#xA;&#xA;If you achieve the very high difficulty needed to create a valid&#xA;bitcoin block, you have achieved a very high bar.&#xA;&#xA;-- &#xA;Jeff Garzik&#xA;Senior Software Engineer and open source evangelist&#xA;BitPay, Inc.      https://bitpay.com/</html></oembed>