<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>AncapAir (npub1ym…afgr0)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1ymkmqpz2jd9h2wm7xllh0yc7gusm6fszaavxeuapgpljsndz34zsqafgr0</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>Business idea: Truly private off-site cloud data backup. &#xA;&#xA;- Users can create an account with just a username and password.&#xA;- 2FA integration with other FOSS solutions&#xA;- Payment with XMR accepted.&#xA;- Non-Crypto payments obviously require applicable identifiable info to process&#xA;- User data is encrypted locally prior to being uploaded to company servers&#xA;- Uploaded data is fragmented and randomly stored across several servers, the number and specificity of which are random, &#xA;- Software is all FOSS (front end and back end), and company encourages auditing of it. &#xA;- Company encourages and allows independent 3rd party audits on site to verify claims of user data privacy&#xA;- Service available on clear net, Tor, and I2P&#xA;- Duress decryption passwords allow users to immediately destroy all backups and account info if necessary. &#xA;&#xA;I have no idea how to implement this, but the fragmenting of user&#39;s encrypted data would ensure:&#xA;&#xA;1) The company literally has no ability to see users private data&#xA;2) LE cannot subpoena or seize any user&#39;s data from the company since they have no ability to provide anything&#xA;3) truly private off-site data backups are available to anyone who wants to get rid of Google, Dropbox, etc.&#xA;&#xA;All of this is technically feasible... But is practically illegal in the &#34;land of the free.&#34; The US government will essentially make the owner of such a company into another Ross Ulbricht.</html></oembed>