<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1k2eekmevs6gg60df75qpjw4a2atmy89vx28c8zqq5jxy64tuzrws39qd6m</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1k2eekmevs6gg60df75qpjw4a2atmy89vx28c8zqq5jxy64tuzrws39qd6m</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23&#xA;📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----&#xA;Hash: SHA1&#xA;&#xA;On 04/23/2014 05:57 PM, Mike Hearn wrote:&#xA;&gt; I&#39;m not going to bother arguing in replies to a blog post. Suffice&#xA;&gt; it to say, miners are already handsomely compensated via both&#xA;&gt; inflation and fees for doing their job of preventing double spends.&#xA;&gt; Your suggestion is people should pay them EVEN MORE for simply not&#xA;&gt; being corrupt. My proposal is simpler - how about we find the ones&#xA;&gt; that are claiming people&#39;s money via coinbases yet not doing their&#xA;&gt; jobs correctly, and take the money back (or destroy it). I think I&#xA;&gt; prefer that one. Miners that are maliciously double spending cannot&#xA;&gt; justify their existence, they offer no useful service and do not&#xA;&gt; deserve compensation as a result.&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&#xA;&#xA;The integrity of Bitcoin is more important than you and your personal&#xA;preferences.&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;You don&#39;t have the right to decide which valid scripts in the&#xA;blockchain will be disregarded, and neither does anyone else.&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;If you don&#39;t like what&#39;s in the blockchain, you and everybody else can&#xA;work within the protocol to orphan the offending block.&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;But if you fail, then what&#39;s written in the blockchain is final and&#xA;the sole purpose of the network is to enforce it - deal with it.&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;PS: We don&#39;t even know who runs BitUndo. They seem to have lots of&#xA;money to spend on web design - I wonder where it came from?&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;- -- &#xA;Support online privacy by using email encryption whenever possible.&#xA;Learn how here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bakOKJFtB-k&#xA;-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----&#xA;Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)&#xA;Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/&#xA;&#xA;iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTWADBAAoJECoisBQbQ4v0A/0H/25j9bvZaEqfyLJSHNh7PGwC&#xA;TpMu0s8D94nX/ipwaOjeY1QMtnWnX9b2H/lDZSnk1rm7IXJTq1c+R/50Uqx5U9QI&#xA;oYnsKX1TiB+T5Uv0C5PaIptEMgPkcNyHwsdXyaaUcu2djB0/YhFRlWR7WCH2QyNG&#xA;3LR5XWLGJz7v6rDxwvMXEHJWO5950bASP1xCVLc/N0PI7BoEUmeRzAoDa1mGJ9yw&#xA;XkVUVDV03B85uTSEriBuQ49ASvv9faAhcehwRwvFFp2krVz6Ov5Jxrv7UN+B61R2&#xA;sgZhI3vaTsyRf+8+pkp0dvSpbwwJ7ESBm+BRMPGTnV1AlwJKqjzDYHgowSe01Nw=&#xA;=COsH&#xA;-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;A non-text attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;Name: 0x1B438BF4.asc&#xA;Type: application/pgp-keys&#xA;Size: 21191 bytes&#xA;Desc: not available&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140423/22a72186/attachment.bin&gt;</html></oembed>