<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1k2eekmevs6gg60df75qpjw4a2atmy89vx28c8zqq5jxy64tuzrws39qd6m</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1k2eekmevs6gg60df75qpjw4a2atmy89vx28c8zqq5jxy64tuzrws39qd6m</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23&#xA;📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----&#xA;Hash: SHA1&#xA;&#xA;On 04/23/2014 06:15 PM, Peter Todd wrote:&#xA;&#xA;&gt; But I also agree with Gavin that the bitcoin-development email list&#xA;&gt; is a perfectly good place to have these types of discussions. I&#xA;&gt; myself have used it repeatedly to publish ideas specifically due to&#xA;&gt; wide readership and multiple independent archives.&#xA;&#xA;A development list is a great place to decide how to implement a&#xA;technical feature, one that feature has been deemed desirable.&#xA;&#xA;The chief scientist has a platform via which he can publicly announce&#xA;proposed protocol changes. Anyone else could do the same.&#xA;&#xA;There are conference happening all the time where people can announce&#xA;ideas like this, to give time for the community to hear the idea and&#xA;generate feedback.&#xA;&#xA;There is absolutely nothing so urgent about this attack that requires&#xA;the consensus process to start here, in a place that most Bitcoin&#xA;users don&#39;t even know about and wouldn&#39;t even know which search terms&#xA;to apply to look for such a discussion if they did.&#xA;&#xA;&gt;&gt; PS: We don&#39;t even know who runs BitUndo. They seem to have lots&#xA;&gt;&gt; of money to spend on web design - I wonder where it came from?&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; Actually we do: Eric Springer&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; See&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; http://www.coindesk.com/double-spending-unconfirmed-transactions-concern-bitcoin/&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt;  https://github.com/espringe - joined Feb 11 2010&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; Anyway that&#39;s just twitter bootstrap or something; I hear the&#xA;&gt; wizards can pump out a site like that in a few hours.&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&#xA;I stand corrected.&#xA;&#xA;- -- &#xA;Support online privacy by using email encryption whenever possible.&#xA;Learn how here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bakOKJFtB-k&#xA;-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----&#xA;Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)&#xA;Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/&#xA;&#xA;iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTWARRAAoJECoisBQbQ4v08kkIAKMSSCn9mBCMj6RwWHK6abud&#xA;UlaKOAh4LNAaJ+pIQD103EGH3JE9pzeaDouupTbdIHqb8CxVO3dn9UFXdfkDW1cf&#xA;YsOOfE0N5crfaODd+NU6jjaf5jXOgmT2ibCU3sSjmphDBMstZfrSaCljtyaj290Y&#xA;urnW1pdL5ZA0zLAUjNO2kXSbuHaE3CTz72s4dWsiRBsQLVAD8j5C5o8gxFVeZd7s&#xA;Ba4yGtGAsd0HWikUjE2L4G/J8RzbxUrm5w31A4lawkF+SqtJcFiwoxrXX+FVdi/8&#xA;rfAY/l0EBoRrkW+cajcj29eq1eOOIER0Zcu2FzpPc45Xywh9RCh8C3zgWitOvcI=&#xA;=IR+Y&#xA;-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;A non-text attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;Name: 0x1B438BF4.asc&#xA;Type: application/pgp-keys&#xA;Size: 21191 bytes&#xA;Desc: not available&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140423/bf90e17d/attachment.bin&gt;</html></oembed>