<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1uu2fve28mkg68uequseraz8gee7qg64733lr9r2g4c0xs5pmqnuslr4rpf</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1uu2fve28mkg68uequseraz8gee7qg64733lr9r2g4c0xs5pmqnuslr4rpf</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-08-04&#xA;📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----&#xA;Hash: SHA1&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;On 08/04/2015 08:12 PM, Gavin Andresen via bitcoin-dev wrote:&#xA;&gt; On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev &#xA;&gt; &lt;bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org &#xA;&gt; &lt;mailto:bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org&gt;&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; I would say that things already demonstrately got terrible. The &#xA;&gt; mining landscape is very centralized, with apparently a majority &#xA;&gt; depending on agreements to trust each other&#39;s announced blocks &#xA;&gt; without validation.&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; And that is a problem... why?&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; As far as I can tell,&#xA;&#xA;[snip]&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;It&#39;s a big problem. What are you dismissing it for?&#xA;&#xA;With Bitcoin in fledgling 0.x version state this is neither desirable&#xA;nor encouraging.&#xA;&#xA;Development did not freeze at some time in the past and now we see how&#xA;the userbase reacts. Miners, btw, are arguibly still a class of user&#xA;as long as they are guaranteed coinbase.&#xA;&#xA;When they start making and proving themselves useful in a free&#xA;floating fee market absent coinbase subsidy, we can revisit this&#xA;topic, with the benefit of hindsight.&#xA;&#xA;&gt; As Bitcoin grows, pieces of the ecosystem will specialize.&#xA;&gt; Satoshi&#39;s original code did everything: hashing, block assembly,&#xA;&gt; wallet, consensus, network. That is changing, and that is OK.&#xA;&#xA;[snip]&#xA;&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; And I think the current &#34;demonstrably terrible&#34; Bitcoin system is&#xA;&gt; still INCREDIBLY interesting.&#xA;&gt; &#xA;Pieter never said it wasn&#39;t interesting, so this emphatic statement is&#xA;strange - like someone is trying to convince an audience - but&#xA;anyway... as you, a veritable spring-chicken by your actions and&#xA;words, said the other day: having graduated in &#39;88 you&#39;re &#34;old&#34; and&#xA;speak from experience. Don&#39;t come with that jive, bossy man - bring&#xA;facts and testing to the technical list.&#xA;&#xA;My finance readers, in one camp, and Bitcoin investors, in the other,&#xA;want to see the XT 8MB hard-fork testing data that you mentioned for&#xA;BIP100.&#xA;&#xA;&#34;Being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn.&#34;&#xA;- - Benjamin Franklin&#xA;&#xA;&gt; -- -- Gavin Andresen&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&#xA;Venzen Khaosan&#xA;-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----&#xA;Version: GnuPG v1&#xA;&#xA;iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVwMyOAAoJEGwAhlQc8H1mho4IAKEHVxE4lAs3aIoLXa2fxLP8&#xA;3q7MhfM5vIW9QAM7rjz8YzheMg3Wj2CNfZPuUV7YDTVrLZPrIN/aMY6CIftr7GUS&#xA;pjMI9nnwezFwYX5oyRU+gW51AMFhvexV6ITZYpiLRtWHgK1FZtXWMG13eO/6Jb5U&#xA;Wjflub7suMDvg+ST2PplhQf7fFmnPHrLZg3ISDqK+hvgw20geW1rXC/wCChlewfd&#xA;DqSt9fxqs+NIvbIzS2TgLTkIcHlbKNeI5AeqbaFoaIQtvYALD3Ojt2I/qoCJU1za&#xA;rB8Il7UK0B5uf6xxgErGcYAHzjVpR6Zhsdzo6MiBF1j4ClfNPEQAlG49YjrRXpI=&#xA;=4nai&#xA;-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----</html></oembed>