<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwet</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwet</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-08-13&#xA;📝 Original message:On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Mark Friedenbach &lt;mark at friedenbach.org&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt; As per the rules of BIP 1, I hereby request that the BIP editor please&#xA;&gt; assign an official number to this work. The idea has been discussed before&#xA;&gt; on the bitcoin-dev mailing list:&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-June/008452.html&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; And a reference implementation is available here:&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; https://github.com/maaku/bitcoin/tree/checksequenceverify&#xA;&#xA;I think it&#39;s important to allow some time for discussion with the&#xA;actual proposed text up; as understandings can shift significantly. :)&#xA;Btcdrak already asked me for numbers prior to posting text at all and&#xA;I asked him to post text...</html></oembed>