<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1ccegg9n9lnx6huppxg43m95488yur7pfemkn3pz0agjws5ffvtts0ex8m8</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1ccegg9n9lnx6huppxg43m95488yur7pfemkn3pz0agjws5ffvtts0ex8m8</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-02-20&#xA;📝 Original message:On Feb 20, 2015, at 5:18 PM, Wladimir &lt;laanwj at gmail.com&gt; wrote:&#xA;&#xA;&gt; On Fri, 20 Feb 2015, Adam Back wrote:&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt;&gt; So I was wondering what about changing to committing a bloom filter of&#xA;&gt;&gt; the addresses in the block.  Its seems surprising no one thought of it&#xA;&gt;&gt; that way before (as it seems obvious when you hear it) but that seems&#xA;&#xA;Such a bloom filter was present in the Bits of Proof block store in its last &#xA;public version, so the idea obvious, but not new.&#xA;&#xA;It did support well scanning for BIP32 addresses as the query set extends &#xA;while progressing. &#xA;&#xA;Tamas Blummer&#xA;&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;A non-text attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;Name: signature.asc&#xA;Type: application/pgp-signature&#xA;Size: 496 bytes&#xA;Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150220/b23aaa4c/attachment.sig&gt;</html></oembed>