<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1qa67gm2kyrqt7sldhzeppu5hq2ajx80y8f5rs9z6f34pjce03lms4wrrvp</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1qa67gm2kyrqt7sldhzeppu5hq2ajx80y8f5rs9z6f34pjce03lms4wrrvp</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2014-01-15&#xA;📝 Original message:Love what&#39;s happening here, and how quickly things are moving, from initial&#xA;concept, to first implementation, to first transaction.&#xA;&#xA;But may I suggest we consider changing the name &#34;stealth address&#34; to&#xA;something more neutral?&#xA;&#xA;Already, many people on Reddit and elsewhere are misinterpreting the&#xA;purpose of such addresses, whether for tax evasion, criminal activity, or&#xA;who knows what. Bitcoin already has plenty of political hurdles based&#xA;sheerly on the technology. We don&#39;t need to make life harder for ourselves.&#xA;Even forgetting about politics, the &#34;stealth&#34; association just seems to&#xA;imply something secretive going on. Is a Fortune 500 company or worldwide&#xA;charity going to want to use something called a &#34;stealth address&#34;?&#xA;&#xA;I&#39;d propose the alternate term &#34;routing address&#34;.&#xA;&#xA;- It&#39;s a descriptive, neutral term&#xA;- It accurately describes what the address is: it&#39;s a way to route payment&#xA;to a recipient, but not the actual final address&#xA;- It can be analogized to a bank&#39;s routing number: It is uniquely, publicly&#xA;and persistently tied to the receiving institution. The payor and payee&#xA;knows when payment is made using it, but it&#39;s not publicly visible.&#xA;&#xA;That&#39;s the best I&#39;ve got, but here are some alternate terms in case that&#xA;doesn&#39;t work:&#xA;&#xA;- reusable public address&#xA;- permanent public address&#xA;- permanent address&#xA;- static address&#xA;&#xA;I don&#39;t like these quite as much because they&#39;re not as clear. Normal&#xA;addresses are all reusable, permanent and static -- they just _shouldn&#39;t_&#xA;be used that way.&#xA;&#xA;Ben&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Drak &lt;drak at zikula.org&gt; wrote:&#xA;&#xA;&gt; Sorry this is possibly OT, but someone posted this thread to r/bitcoin and&#xA;&gt; it&#39;s gone straight to position 1. People are really enthusiastic about this&#xA;&gt; feature.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; Drak&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; ------------------------------------------------------------------------------&#xA;&gt; CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.&#xA;&gt; Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For&#xA;&gt; Critical Workloads, Development Environments &amp; Everything In Between.&#xA;&gt; Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&amp;iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk&#xA;&gt; _______________________________________________&#xA;&gt; Bitcoin-development mailing list&#xA;&gt; Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net&#xA;&gt; https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140115/4e4a71a9/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>