<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>bostonwine (npub14q…e2q26)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub14qz92uedt0a8jte8jqg63jr3s5cc99cej36jh883z6tprlu354uqqe2q26</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>It’s an interesting approach, in terms of incentives. If someone is purely financially motivated, they might zap 69% of the kitty (nice) to more-or-less guarantee a reward.&#xA;&#xA;Or if you’re tryna play rough, you might zap 70% (I see you, nostr:npub12262qa4uhw7u8gdwlgmntqtv7aye8vdcmvszkqwgs0zchel6mz7s6cgrkj 😂)&#xA;&#xA;Other users are incentivized to engage: it’s a chance at profit for next-to-no cost (other than perhaps a little bit of dignity, but many of us have bid dignity goodbye long ago).&#xA;&#xA;And for the bot, all it takes is two users trying to win — by trying, I mean zapping a large portion of the reward — to ensure the house makes a profit.&#xA;&#xA;I’ll be curious to see how this model evolves, especially when you introduce businesses with marketing budgets and “influencer” accounts. &#xA;&#xA;Not sure if I like it, but I like that it’s different. It’s refreshing. Onward 🫡</html></oembed>