<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1tfk373zg9dnmtvxnpnq7s2dkdgj37rwfj3yrwld7830qltmv8qps8rfq0n</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1tfk373zg9dnmtvxnpnq7s2dkdgj37rwfj3yrwld7830qltmv8qps8rfq0n</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2017-05-12&#xA;📝 Original message:I&#39;ve written a new BIP draft for OP_CHECKBLOCKVERSION to allow the community &#xA;to put economic pressure on miners to deploy softforks without the extreme of &#xA;a UASF.&#xA;&#xA;    https://github.com/luke-jr/bips/blob/bip-cbv/bip-cbv.mediawiki&#xA;&#xA;Due to the potential for miners to maliciously block this softfork, it is &#xA;suggested that we deploy it using BIP 8 to ensure it eventually activates even &#xA;if encountering hostility.&#xA;&#xA;This is intended to be an alternative to BIP 8 in the long term.&#xA;It is NOT intended to make BIP 148 obsolete, given the timeframes involved.&#xA;&#xA;An implementation is available (based on top of BIP 115&#39;s implementation):&#xA;&#xA;   https://github.com/luke-jr/bitcoin/compare/cbah...luke-jr:checkblockversion&#xA;&#xA;Luke</html></oembed>