<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>Joel Walbert (npub1mw…y59rj)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1mw8jj8w0jjfh8afzgpcvhm604wqtn2xngdpydt9plc6pznx9rhgqny59rj</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>How does free movement violate property? The state is the one defining the property that is allegedly violated. Whether a Mexican, a Moroccan or a Missourian or my next door neighbor, their movement only violates property when they violate private property. So what makes the first two &#39;bad&#39; but the last &#39;ok&#39;?</html></oembed>