rich1.0npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58https://nostr.ae/npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58njumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2014-01-15 📝 Original message:"Routing address" is pretty good too. Unsure whether the synergy and familiarity with bank routing numbers improves the situation, or not... On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Roy Badami <roy at gnomon.org.uk> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 03:44:17PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> "static address" seems like a reasonable attempt at describing intended >> use/direction. > > ...as opposed to an address configured by DHCP? > > More seriously, I don't think a typical user will understand anything from > the phrase "static address". But it is a neutral name, and it is shorter > than "address-of-a-type-for-which-reuse-is-not-deprecated". :-) > > -roy -- Jeff Garzik Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/