rich1.0npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kwhttps://nostr.ae/npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kwnjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2015-06-26 📝 Original message:I completely agree with Pieter: usage will grow to fill whatever maximum block size the miners decide to allow (or whatever maximum block size is imposed by minimum transaction fees or a hard cap on block size). I am not scared by increased usage, though: more usage and adoption means more investment, more smart engineers, and more people with incentives to solve whatever scaling problems crop up. All of that makes Bitcoin stronger. And I don't feel like this process has been hurried: I've been working on this (thinking, testing, simulating, talking, writing code, talking to key people and companies) almost exclusively since late last year. In my humble opinion, BIP 101 is a good compromise between "no limit, let the miners decide" and "lower the max size so a raspberry pi running on a 56K modem can be a full node." -- -- Gavin Andresen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150626/6143a1be/attachment.html>