<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1xqshkqv2g7uea4xzqwvmgjcz7u8vfavw6aazs999v0azsv3w7u3qpymc2p</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1xqshkqv2g7uea4xzqwvmgjcz7u8vfavw6aazs999v0azsv3w7u3qpymc2p</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2014-05-08&#xA;📝 Original message:On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Mike Hearn &lt;mike at plan99.net&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt;&gt; In a way it looks similar to how the Bitcoin DNS seeds work, trying to&#xA;&gt;&gt; find good and stable nodes, although more extensive.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; Yeah, it&#39;s somewhat similar, except that Tor directory authorities are&#xA;&gt; authenticated (the public keys are in the source code), whereas DNS seeds&#xA;&gt; aren&#39;t. Also Bitcoin puts way more emphasis on decentralisation than Tor&#xA;&gt; does.&#xA;&#xA;Right, having authenticated &#39;directory authorities&#39; hardcoded in the&#xA;source code would be out of the question for bitcoin.&#xA;&#xA;Either the stats would have to be public, or private/authenticated to&#xA;parties the owner of the node configures themselves.&#xA;&#xA;Wladimir</html></oembed>