<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1wccnjljxnarlx564vuc37hmuzuffurljevjnmuq4u0vjmh7e933sn3hnuq</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1wccnjljxnarlx564vuc37hmuzuffurljevjnmuq4u0vjmh7e933sn3hnuq</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23&#xA;📝 Original message:On 04/23/2014 10:32 PM, Luke-Jr wrote:&#xA;&gt; f) I missed the part where BIP 32 redefined &#34;account&#34; to mean &#34;subwallet&#34; &#xA;&gt; instead of what has traditionally been called &#34;account&#34; in Bitcoin.&#xA;&#xA;Ah, okay. The last time I saw Bitcoin-qt it was still using independent&#xA;addresses.&#xA;&#xA;&gt; In that case, single-subwallet wallet software probably needs to have the user &#xA;&gt; provide a subwallet number in addition to the seed.&#xA;&#xA;Which brings us back to my original complaint that the user can be&#xA;confused because he doesn&#39;t see all his funds.&#xA;&#xA;-- &#xA;Best Regards / S pozdravom,&#xA;&#xA;Pavol Rusnak &lt;stick at gk2.sk&gt;</html></oembed>