<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub18xqykhf26udeq2nyk98ee0a5q4w3s2f75m405a6zswpdy573lxeqmhg6zk</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub18xqykhf26udeq2nyk98ee0a5q4w3s2f75m405a6zswpdy573lxeqmhg6zk</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2014-01-15&#xA;📝 Original message:Yes. Good idea(s).&#xA;&#xA;&gt; Might I propose &#34;reusable address&#34;.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; I think that describes it best to any non-programmer, and even more so&#xA;&gt; encourages wallets to present options as &#39;one time use&#39; vs &#39;reusable&#39;.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; It definitely packs a marketing punch which could help drive adoption. The&#xA;&gt; feature is only useful if/when broadly adopted.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; I think it meets all the criteria required:&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt;    - Communication between parties is a single message from the payee,&#xA;&gt; which may be public&#xA;&gt;    - Multiple payments to the same address are not publicly linkable on&#xA;&gt; the&#xA;&gt; blockchain&#xA;&gt;    - The payee has explicitly designated they expect to receive more than&#xA;&gt; one payment at that address&#xA;&gt;    - Payer can publicly prove they made a payment to the reusable address&#xA;&gt; by revealing a secret&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; I have high hopes for this feature. The war *against* address reuse may&#xA;&gt; soon be a distant memory.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:44:17 -0800, Jeff Garzik &lt;jgarzik at bitpay.com&gt;&#xA;&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt;&gt; &#34;static address&#34; seems like a reasonable attempt at describing intended&#xA;&gt;&gt; use/direction.&#xA;&gt;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&gt; On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Gregory Maxwell &lt;gmaxwell at gmail.com&gt;&#xA;&gt;&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt;&gt;&gt; On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Ben Davenport&#xA;&gt;&gt;&gt; &lt;bendavenport at gmail.com&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; But may I suggest we consider changing the name &#34;stealth address&#34; to&#xA;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; something more neutral?&#xA;&gt;&gt;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&gt;&gt; ACK.  Regardless of the &#39;political&#39; overtones, I think stealth is a&#xA;&gt;&gt;&gt; little cringe-worthy.&#xA;&gt;&gt;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&gt;&gt; &#34;Private address&#34; would be fine if not for confusion with private-keys.&#xA;&gt;&gt;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&gt;&gt; &#34;Static address&#34; is perhaps the best in my view. (also helps improve&#xA;&gt;&gt;&gt; awareness that normal addresses are intended to be more&#xA;&gt;&gt;&gt; one-use-ness)------------------------------------------------------------------------------&#xA;&gt; CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.&#xA;&gt; Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For&#xA;&gt; Critical Workloads, Development Environments &amp; Everything In Between.&#xA;&gt; Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today.&#xA;&gt; http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&amp;iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk_______________________________________________&#xA;&gt; Bitcoin-development mailing list&#xA;&gt; Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net&#xA;&gt; https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development&#xA;&gt;</html></oembed>