<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1w7tezshngplj3fd8r9twxv6zujrwaxq7v98q6t4rdhd0y7u2tfnsmwj55c</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1w7tezshngplj3fd8r9twxv6zujrwaxq7v98q6t4rdhd0y7u2tfnsmwj55c</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2012-11-27&#xA;📝 Original message:&gt;&gt; X-ISO4217-A3&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; I see that draft-stanish-x-iso4217-a3 is not standards track, is there&#xA;&gt; a reason for this?&#xA;&#xA;Of the three currently published proposals, all are essentially IANA&#xA;registry proposals.&#xA;&#xA;We are currently working with IETF staff, with open offers of support&#xA;from multiple well funded commercial bodies, to transition these&#xA;proposals through to IANA management.&#xA;&#xA;It appears that the Independent Stream Editor path will be used to&#xA;transition these through to IANA, at which time the proposals&#xA;themselves will be converted to Informational status.&#xA;&#xA;(As far as I understand right now, Within the IETF, Standards Track&#xA;has special meaning and entails relatively large degrees of&#xA;bureaucracy that are not within the current contributors&#39; resources.&#xA;It is also worth pointing out that many popular protocols implemented&#xA;on the majority of systems (IIRC, such as IMAP) never reach formal&#xA;standardization for this reason. It should be noted that in these&#xA;cases, this does not make the protocols any less attractive as&#xA;potential components for system implementation.)&#xA;&#xA;&gt; It also doesn&#39;t appear to address ~any of the the targeted items here.&#xA;&gt; Is there another draft I should be looking for which has more overlap&#xA;&gt; with the discussion here?&#xA;&#xA;As outlined in the previous post:&#xA;  - Internet Financial EXchange (IFEX). A proposal under development&#xA;that facilitates the negotiation of financial transactions between&#xA;internet-based financial endpoints. (The area we would love your&#xA;input) http://www.ifex-project.org/our-proposals/ifex&#xA;&#xA;As well as the information linked to above, significant but not&#xA;particularly well grounded discussions have occurred regarding the&#xA;IFEX-based paradigm for settlement versus some other proposed&#xA;paradigms, in particular Ripple (as it appeared some months ago),&#xA;which can be read here:&#xA;https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/rippleusers/v4bEBZZVEsA[1-25]&#xA;&#xA;Kind regards and with the hopes of combining our efforts as a joint&#xA;proposal that can benefit other currencies/commodities and settlement&#xA;systems as well as Bitcoin,&#xA;Walter Stanish&#xA;Skype:walter.stanish</html></oembed>