<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1xv3g4rkhj7eyape0cqjhc9g4ljdu5axqkgcdewma854a8r7e0mtsl5j2ga</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1xv3g4rkhj7eyape0cqjhc9g4ljdu5axqkgcdewma854a8r7e0mtsl5j2ga</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-09-28&#xA;📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----&#xA;Hash: SHA512&#xA;&#xA;And still no movement on BIP 63...&#xA;&#xA;https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1083961.20&#xA;&#xA;Apart from that,&#xA;&#xA;All my prior objections to XT still hold as expressed on this list.&#xA;XT is not acceptable.&#xA;&#xA;On the topic of consensus:&#xA;&#xA;Reaching consensus, I hope, is something that developers can&#xA;accomplish by refining and adjusting the BIPS and coming to agreement&#xA;upon them.  This should be something that can be done in a few months&#xA;time, before the end of the year.&#xA;&#xA;Cheers,&#xA;&#xA;- - O&#xA;&#xA;Adam Back via bitcoin-dev:&#xA;&gt; I wonder what Gavin&#39;s views are, he&#39;s usually constructive, and see&#xA;&gt; if he&#39;ll include it in XT - I think he may have said he was&#xA;&gt; supportive.&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; The rationale for soft vs hard-forks is well known, so I wont go&#xA;&gt; over them.&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; Adam&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; On 28 September 2015 at 06:48, Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev &#xA;&gt; &lt;bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt;&gt; There is no consensus on using a soft fork to deploy this&#xA;&gt;&gt; feature. It will result in the same problems as all the other&#xA;&gt;&gt; soft forks - SPV wallets will become less reliable during the&#xA;&gt;&gt; rollout period. I am against that, as it&#39;s entirely avoidable.&#xA;&gt;&gt; &#xA;&gt;&gt; Make it a hard fork and my objection will be dropped.&#xA;&gt;&gt; &#xA;&gt;&gt; Until then, as there is no consensus, you need to do one of two&#xA;&gt;&gt; things:&#xA;&gt;&gt; &#xA;&gt;&gt; 1) Drop the &#34;everyone must agree to make changes&#34; idea that&#xA;&gt;&gt; people here like to peddle, and do it loudly, so everyone in the&#xA;&gt;&gt; community is correctly informed&#xA;&gt;&gt; &#xA;&gt;&gt; 2) Do nothing&#xA;&gt;&gt; &#xA;&gt;&gt; &#xA;&gt;&gt; &#xA;&gt;&gt; _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev&#xA;&gt;&gt; mailing list bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org &#xA;&gt;&gt; https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev&#xA;&gt;&gt; &#xA;&gt; _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing&#xA;&gt; list bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org &#xA;&gt; https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&#xA;- -- &#xA;http://abis.io ~&#xA;&#34;a protocol concept to enable decentralization&#xA;and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good&#34;&#xA;https://keybase.io/odinn&#xA;-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----&#xA;&#xA;iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJWCa0jAAoJEGxwq/inSG8CuCUIALiRt6cE3b+9f+l9m6aMTjIR&#xA;vTEIM/7B4dIZW9eatXmkxyd44uz5YoN93SlZtV62c90HCqqpFRBCfyXRyXzQ11E7&#xA;0i70or5LnWDOqrD1bSsCEdrQxPIpAQnv101UHe3iyn/uHAVBiz/HfqvGMruNt0r1&#xA;4sMecp+LedWpy6/p9c6iMHV1rhtYRfmRfJHj+9KlSn+in5PQKx2kieWqpfqjmlNs&#xA;J/UNoLvRuF0YxDcqEdp2BAaI0s+NyXBo3YDi4R77U9YPRj/cYuWHh/yPKAvFW+2K&#xA;0d9NNuKSKEY/m4uW3ghPEJL7OxlGbOoNWFS3kcKYr+BanfsPTov7yHQhBuRBRPw=&#xA;=hd0W&#xA;-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----</html></oembed>