rich1.0npub1k2eekmevs6gg60df75qpjw4a2atmy89vx28c8zqq5jxy64tuzrws39qd6mhttps://nostr.ae/npub1k2eekmevs6gg60df75qpjw4a2atmy89vx28c8zqq5jxy64tuzrws39qd6mnjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2015-11-01 📝 Original message:On 10/30/2015 10:43 PM, Rusty Russell via bitcoin-dev wrote: > By that benchmark, we should aim for "reasonable certainty". A > transaction which would never have been generated by any known software > is the minimum bar. Adding "...which would have to be deliberately > stupid with many redundant OP_CHECKSIG etc" surpasses it. The only extra > safeguard I can think of is clear, widespread notification of the > change. If the policy of Bitcoin Core development includes a willingness to makes the utxos created by software other than Bitcoin Core unspendable, then it certainly merits clear, widespread notification. Even if that is actually a good policy, the reasons why should be made abundantly clear. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0xEAD9E623.asc Type: application/pgp-keys Size: 23337 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151101/1034f016/attachment.bin> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151101/1034f016/attachment.sig>