<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1gymmksd9tgwzc5w33umlx08sc2ggys3v2cucmpvl7yy9720wh49s8dvff7</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1gymmksd9tgwzc5w33umlx08sc2ggys3v2cucmpvl7yy9720wh49s8dvff7</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2022-04-25&#xA;📝 Original message:On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 at 07:36, ZmnSCPxj &lt;ZmnSCPxj at protonmail.com&gt; wrote&#xA;&#xA;CTV *can* benefit layer 2 users, which is why I switched from vaguely&#xA;&gt; apathetic to CTV, to vaguely supportive of it.&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;Other proposals exist that also benefit L2 solutions. What makes you&#xA;support CTV specifically?&#xA;&#xA;Centrally documenting the implications of each side by side and point by&#xA;point might be a useful next step. This would enable a larger part of the&#xA;community to understand each proposal and may reduce repetition and&#xA;misunderstandings on this list.&#xA;&#xA;Once a common understanding of the implications of each proposal is in&#xA;place, their tradeoffs can be considered, facilitating creating consensus&#xA;on which proposal benefits a maximum of users.&#xA;&#xA;Zac&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220425/8855a181/attachment-0001.html&gt;</html></oembed>