<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kw</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kw</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2013-10-27&#xA;📝 Original message:RE: use HTTP-like status codes:&#xA;&#xA;Okey dokey, I&#39;ll add a one-byte machine-readable HTTP-like status code.&#xA;Unless y&#39;all want a 32-bit status code.  Or maybe a varint. Or a&#xA;three-character numeric string. I really and truly don&#39;t care, but I am&#xA;writing this code right now so whatever you want, decide quickly.&#xA;&#xA;If anybody has strong feelings about what the reject categories should be,&#xA;then please take the time to write a specific list, I can&#39;t read your&#xA;mind....&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;-- &#xA;--&#xA;Gavin Andresen&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131028/5e1a8963/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>