<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1xvnnyhz8e4eklaakjc9xgm5w8pzkuckt923uacz2cftqdqx23g7q3c5rqg</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1xvnnyhz8e4eklaakjc9xgm5w8pzkuckt923uacz2cftqdqx23g7q3c5rqg</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2014-03-27&#xA;📝 Original message:The benefit I see is avoiding reuse of keys between coins while not having&#xA;each wallet implementation have to know about each coin in order to scan&#xA;for transactions.  Wallet X supports Doge and Bitcoin.  If both used a&#xA;shared sequence of keys, say the first two end up Bitcoin, then 10 Doge,&#xA;then some more Bitcoin.  If you took this seed to Wallet Y, which only&#xA;supports Bitcoin (either the wallet&#39;s support or what is installed on the&#xA;system it&#39;s being used), it will see a gap of 10 addresses, and presume no&#xA;more scanning with a 5 gap limit.  The alternative is to reuse keys for&#xA;each coin.&#xA;&#xA;It also seems like a solution might be to only expect interoperability on a&#xA;single sequence, and provide backups of each final sequence to use between&#xA;different wallet implementations.  This allows flexibility in hierarchies&#xA;depending on needs and support of wallet, but allows sharing.  The short&#xA;seed would only be useful for the same wallet, but sharing between wallets&#xA;would use the longer keys.  That will give predictable behavior for users&#xA;(although less friendly) and lead to less errors.&#xA;&#xA;-Allen&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Pieter Wuille &lt;pieter.wuille at gmail.com&gt;wrote:&#xA;&#xA;&gt; On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Pavol Rusnak &lt;stick at gk2.sk&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt; &gt; Cointype in path is for separation purposes, not for identification.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; I don&#39;t understand what that gains you.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; --&#xA;&gt; Pieter&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; ------------------------------------------------------------------------------&#xA;&gt; _______________________________________________&#xA;&gt; Bitcoin-development mailing list&#xA;&gt; Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net&#xA;&gt; https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development&#xA;&gt;&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140327/0e05360a/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>