<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1dtr22xd42nv07un2xq0rmtkqkjylgsmexau0anxxafa9xmmn2ncshu7wrs</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1dtr22xd42nv07un2xq0rmtkqkjylgsmexau0anxxafa9xmmn2ncshu7wrs</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2011-12-18&#xA;🗒️ Summary of this message: Extended URIs allow servers to negotiate payment details, making aliases practical for organizations that trust a CA with their funds.&#xA;📝 Original message:On Sunday, December 18, 2011 6:58:37 PM slush wrote:&#xA;&gt; Maybe I&#39;m retarded, but where&#39;s the point in providing alliases containing&#xA;&gt; yet another hash in URL?&#xA;&#xA;The point of the extended URI is to allow the server to negotiate payment &#xA;details (payment/order information, fees, new privacy address, etc) rather &#xA;than merely sending a simple payment to a single fixed address.&#xA;&#xA;I am not convinced *aliases* are practical, without CA trust. An organization &#xA;that wants to trust a CA with all their funds can leave off the address &#xA;portion, to provide more human-friendly URIs.</html></oembed>